Legal Opinion

Philamalee v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1899No. 10504PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to tlie district court for Cedar County. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

James Philamalee was prosecuted in the district court of Cedar county under an information charging the crime of robbery, and upon the trial was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the period of one year. He has brought the record here for review, alleging as grounds for reversal that certain instructions were erroneous, and that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction.

Complaint is made of the following definition of larceny contained in the seventh instruction: “Larceny is the wrongful and unlawful taking and carrying or leading away…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Housh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. St. Louis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Carrall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Murphy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Johnson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Wallace v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Burk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. McDaniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API