Legal Opinion

Hoosier Stone Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1892No. 15,352PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The material facts stated in the complaint of the appellant are these : The appellee is a railway com*577pany and the appellant is the owner of a stone quarry, and the former furnished to the latter a car for the transportation of heavy blocks of stone, knowing at the time of furnishing the car that the service of the latter required good and sufficient ears, and knowing, also, the grade of the track used by the latter, and that the nature of its business was such as to require sufficient brakes, brake cogs, ratchets and attachment. The railway company was under contract to furnish the appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Losee v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Dayton v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. State ex rel. Travellers Insurance v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Shattuck v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State, Ind. State Highway Com'n v. SpeidelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Tobin v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Daugherty v. HerzogIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hockett v. BreunigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API