Legal Opinion
Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
Plaintiffs are the owners of one third of the stock of Kenton Hotel, Inc., and the individual defendants are the owners of two thirds of the stock. It is the plaintiffs’ claim that on March 11, 1941, the stockholders of the corporation amended the bylaws to provide: (1) that no resolution of stockholders should be adopted except by unanimous vote of the stockholders, (2) that the election of directors would have to be by unanimous vote of the stockholders, (3) that no resolution of the directors should be adopted except by unanimous vote of the directors, (4) that the bylaws might be amended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- In re the Election of Directors of the Boulevard Theatre & Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In re the Election of Directors of the Rapid Transit Ferry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Reiss v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Levin v. MayerNew York Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goldfield Corp. v. General Host Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Management Technologies, Inc. v. MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Ripley v. StorerNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944