Legal Opinion
Croft v. Hall
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 19, 1946No. 15820PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Associate Justice Stukes
delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The city of Orangeburg has an ordinance whereby operators of taxicabs are required to procure and file with the city clerk liability insurance policies in stated amounts and with stipulated conditions, for personal injury and property damage. The appellants, Hall, are alleged to have been so engaged, with the other appellant as their insurer.
Dewey Whetstone was a driver for them and about midnight on December 27, 1943, undertook to take two passengers to their respective homes in the country and he carried his wife, Mrs. Ruby C.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Peeples v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Bryant v. Blue Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Camp v. Petroleum Carrier Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- Bowers v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Ward v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Vereen v. Liberty Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.