Legal Opinion
Bakas v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 3, 2009No. Civ. 09-1263 (RHK/SRN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Anastasia Bakas has sued her former investment adviser, 1 Defendant Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (“Ameriprise”), alleging that it breached its investment-services agreements with her and violated the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-l et seq. (the “1940 Act”). Ameriprise now moves to compel arbitration or, in the alternative, to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion in part and compel arbitration of this dispute. 2
BACKGROUND
Ameriprise is an investment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Klatte v. Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014