Legal Opinion
Melrose Floor Co., Inc. v. Lechner
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1989No. C7-88-1566PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Respondent Wiese and Cox represented the plaintiff in a 1984 lawsuit against appellant Edward J. Lechner, claiming negligence in legal services when Lechner set up a pension plan in 1978. Lechner claims, contribution from Wiese and Cox based on service provided by that law firm in the administration of the pension plan. Lech-ner appeals the trial court’s summary judgment disallowing a contribution claim for reasons stated in Eustis v. The David Agency, Inc., 417 N.W.2d 295 (Minn.Ct.App.1987), a ease decided several months before the summary judgment issued in this case.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Schauer v. JoyceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Held v. ArantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Stone v. SatrianaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Brown v. LaChanceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Professional Fiduciary, Inc. v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.