Pugh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Albert Pugh sued State Farm Fire Casualty Insurance Company (State Farm) for breach of contract, based upon State Farm's failure to pay benefits when Pugh's house was destroyed by fire. The trial resulted in a jury verdict for State Farm. Pugh appeals on the grounds that inadmissible and prejudicial testimony was improperly allowed into evidence. We disagree and, therefore, affirm the judgment based on the jury's verdict.
Pugh purchased the home in question from Clarence Wells. Wells had maintained a homeowner's insurance policy with State Farm while he owned the home. The policy was written…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Cunningham v. LoweryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Cook v. LatimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- L.J.K. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- W.L.O. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Gable v. BolesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.