Legal Opinion

Cook v. Latimer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 17, 1966No. 4 Div. 192PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

Appellant brought suit against appellee to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident. The complaint, as it went to the jury, charged appellee’s intestate, Walter F. Latimer, Jr., with wantonness in operating the-automobile involved in the accident and alleged that appellant was a passenger in the automobile at the time of the accident. The defendant filed a plea of the general issue and also a plea of recoupment alleging plaintiff’s wantonness in operating the automobile at the time of the accident. There was a jury verdict, and judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Shelby County v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Forest Investment Corp. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Thomas v. BrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Alabama Power Company v. ScholzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Stephens v. Central of Georgia R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Sun Papers, Inc. v. JerrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. L.J.K. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API