Legal Opinion

Vail v. Vail

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1978No. 77-95PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented by this writ of certiorari, granted to review the Court of Civil Appeals, is whether the error of the trial court in compelling Rubert Vail to testify over his invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination was so prejudicial as to require reversal. We hold it was and will reverse the decision of that court and remand the cause to it.

For a complete account of this divorce action, see the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion, Vail v. Vail, 360 So.2d 994 (Ala.App. 1977) [Ms. 14 September 1977]. For the purposes of our inquiry the following facts, found by the Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gamble v. GambleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  2. Deal v. Houston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Pigford v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Gamble v. GambleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Ex Parte BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Hinds v. HindsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Pennington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Howard v. HowardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API