Legal Opinion
Agristor Credit Corp. v. Schmidlin
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 23, 1985No. Civ. 83-1847-RE, 83-1848-REPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
REDDEN, District Judge:
These two actions have been consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiff in No. 83-1847, Agristor Credit Corporation (ACC), brought this action for breach of contract and replevin. Plaintiff in No. 83-1848, Agristor Leasing (AL), is suing for breach of a lease and replevin. Plaintiffs and various third-party defendants have now moved for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
I. No. 83-1847
Plaintiff ACC brought this action against defendants George and Enola Schmidlin. Defendants are dairy farmers who live in Banks, Oregon. Plaintiff contends that defendants are in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Agristor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Agristor Leasing v. Gene E.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Luckey v. Alside, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.