Legal Opinion

In re Steele

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 11, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

HAMMOND, District Judge.

By agreement between the assignee and the bankrupts, the question is submitted for the opinion of the court, as if on certificate of the register, whether or not the refusal of the assignee to allow them each his gold watch as exempt property, is proper under the circumstances set out in the agreement of facts. John Steele has been allowed, and claims no exemption except this watch, which is described as “a plain, old style, single case gold watch, which he has owned for twenty-five years or more, and which would scarcely sell for twenty-five dollars.” R. L. Steele has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
  2. Hitchcock v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  3. Montague v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  4. Dunlap v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Willson v. EllisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. In re SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1899
  3. In re H. L. Evans & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1907
  4. In re JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1899
  5. Coffinberry v. MaddenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API