Legal Opinion
In Re Marietta State Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 21, 1931No. 3945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the case as above).
Article 462 (Rev. St.) provides:
“Compensation of counsel, employees and assistants, and all expenses of supervision and liquidation shall be fixed by the Commissioner, subject to the approval of the district court of the county in which said bank was located, if in session, or the judge thereof if in vacation. The compensation of special liquidation agents shall be the same as is provided by law for State bank examiners, and shall, upon the certificate of the Commissioner, be paid out of the fund of such insolvent bank in the hands of the Commissioner.”
Under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Chapman v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- State Banking Board v. Winters State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Gossett v. Griffin & KimbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Dayton Reavis Corp. v. Rampart Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990