Legal Opinion

Dayton Reavis Corp. v. Rampart Capital Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1998No. 10-97-249-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

We affirm a conditional interlocutory order appointing a receiver to take control of certain property that is the subject of disputed claims.

THE DISPUTE

Rampart Capital Corporation (Rampart) owned a note dated May 30, 1985, signed by Cameron Henderson Oil Company, Inc. (CHOC), payable to the First National Bank of Wortham. Rampart believed that it held a deed of trust to secure the note, covering three lots in Mexia to which Dayton Reavis Corporation (Dayton Reavis) held title. When Rampart posted the property for foreclosure, Dayton Reavis and CHOC sought injunctive…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Balias v. Balias, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Abella v. Knight Oil Tools, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pursley-Wilson Investment Company v. George D. Gordon, R. A. Deison and Roger Broach, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. William H. Scurlock v. John M. Hubbard, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API