Legal Opinion

Dial v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 21, 1983No. 13834PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAMMAGE, Justice.

This is an involuntary mental health commitment under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5547-1, et seq. (Supp.1982). The numerous and repetitious briefs filed by appellant raise a total of 17 points of error. Eight of these points turn upon a single contention: that the testimony of the State’s witness, Dr. Sedberry, as to appellant’s statements concerning an assault on another patient, and medical records maintained during appellant’s observation, care and treatment, were privileged information which should not have been admitted into evidence at the commitment hearing. Four of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard v. SadlerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Greater Fort Worth & Tarrant County Community Action Agency v. MimsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bank of Texas v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Bank of Texas v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. In the Best Interest & Protection of G.B.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
  3. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Holliman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. In re State ex rel. MayberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API