Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
J. WOODFIN JONES, Justice.
With revisions to the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) in 1995, the legislature created a statutory alternative to traditional rate-of-return ratemaking. 1 Appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) elected to be governed under this new scheme, which provides instead for “incentive regulation.” Pursuant to this scheme, SWBT applied to appellee, the Public Utility Commission (the Commission), for a rate-group reclassification. 2 The Commission denied the request in most respects, and SWBT sought judicial review in the district court. 3 The district court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sorokolit v. RhodesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Cail v. Service Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Dallas Merchant's & Concessionaire's Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Sharp v. House of Lloyd, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cities of Austin v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Pickett v. Texas Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.