Price v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The primary issue in this action is whether, in order for psychological injuries or conditions to be compensable under the workers' compensation act, the injury or condition must be proven by expert testimony based at least in part on objective findings. If compensation may be awarded on the basis of medical testimony regarding wholly subjective symptoms, the issue then becomes whether the jury in this case was given accurate instructions on this rule of law.
We hold that the objective-subjective distinction is inappropriate in actions to recover for psychological injuries and that petitioner…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Cooper v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Falk v. Keene Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Saunderlin v. E.I. Dupont Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Tollycraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Sturgeon v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Malarkey Asphalt Co. v. WyborneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.