Legal Opinion

Savage's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 23, 1915PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

Under the workmen’s compensation act the findings of the Industrial Accident Board are equivalent to the verdict of a jury or the findings of a judge, and are not to be set aside if there is any evidence to support them. Pigeon’s Case, 216 Mass. 51. Diaz’s Case, 217 Mass. 36.

The Industrial Accident Board made the following findings: “The employee, Joseph W. Savage, did not receive a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment; that his death occurred by reason of his unexplained absence from the car which he was engaged in unloading; that his presence on the railroad…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Fumiciello's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Diaz's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. King's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Griffith v. Cole Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. United Paperboard Co. v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Union Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API