Legal Opinion
Alexander S. by and Through Bowers v. Boyd
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 22, 1995No. Civil Action 3:90-3062-17PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the class of incarcerated juveniles they represent (collectively the “plaintiffs”), move for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Defendants oppose plaintiffs’ fee requests. Although the parties, facts and prior proceedings in this class-action suit are fully set forth in the prior opinions of this court, see Alexander S. v. Boyd, 876 F.Supp. 773 (D.S.C.1995); Alexander S. v. Boyd C/A No.: 3:90-3062-17 (order dated June 27, 1995), a brief review of the procedural history of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Polay v. McMahonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Lopez v. XTEL Construction Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- New Jersey Citizen Action v. Riviera Motel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- McLaughlin Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Boston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Pearson v. PearsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.