Western Union Life Co. of Houston v. Ensminger
Court of Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceLeslie, Chief Justice
The particular assignments above discussed, and on which the appeal is disposed of, are not to be in all respects commended, but the majority of this court has concluded that said assignments may be considered as sufficient to give this court jurisdiction to determine the questions presented. We are aware of the distinction between assignments and propositions germane thereto, as pointed out in Clarendon Land Inv. Agency Co. v. McClelland, 86 Tex. 179, 23 S.W. 576, 1100, 22 L.R.A. 105, but the language of the above assignments, taken as a whole, may, we think, be regarded as sufficient to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Cabell v. ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Cammack v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Morrison v. NeelyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.