Legal Opinion

Cammack v. Rogers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1903No. 1204PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from McLennan County.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, as follows:

“It is a suit brought by the appellee, Mrs. Rogers, against the appellant, to recover possession of certain lands, and for damages resulting from an alleged breach of a rent contract wherein the appellant became bound and liable as lessee. One of the items of damages sought to be recovered by appellee is the alleged failure of the appellant to properly and with reasonable care farm -and cultivate the premises rented by him from appellee, which it is claimed he was bound under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wilson v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Crain v. HuntingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Egan v. Lockney Farmers' Co-op. Soc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Lang v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. O'Farrell v. De O'FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Provident National Bank v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API