Legal Opinion

Spry v. Farmers' Union Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1930No. Appeal 5PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellant sues to recover $1500 on a policy of fire insurance, and complains here that leave to amend its statement of claim was refused, and that relevant evidence was excluded. Before the case was called for trial, plaintiff asked leave to amend, setting forth in the petition a copy of the statement of claim proposed to be filed; a rule to show cause was granted, and, after hearing, was discharged on the ground that it averred a new cause of action after one year, the period in which the policy required suit to be brought. At the trial, leave to amend to the same effect…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Duggan.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Mentz v. Lancaster Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Thomas v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. McGinness v. Caledonian InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Farmers' Mutual Insurance v. Taylor ex rel. GrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Wilson v. Howard Johns RestaurantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Arner v. SokolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Schwab v. P. J. Oesterling & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API