Legal Opinion

Duncan v. City of Tuscaloosa

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1952No. 6 Div. 371PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the equity court overruling the demurrer to a bill in equity. The purpose of the bill is to abate an alleged nuisance. The allegations ■of the bill substantially show the following.

The City of Tuscaloosa, the complainant, is a municipal corporation. Richard B. Duncan, the respondent, is engaged in the business of buying chickens by the thousands when very young and raising them for sale on a lot in the City of Tuscaloosa fronting about 81 feet on the west side of 'Thirty-Second Avenue and located about 230 feet from the north margin of Fifth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. 1st Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Higgins v. Decorah Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Bloch v. McCownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Kyser v. HertzlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. General Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Lauderdale County Board of Education v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Banks v. HarbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Trans-Lux Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Smith v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API