Legal Opinion

Carey v. Levy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1951No. Docket 53, Calendar 44,915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by them in consequence of an automobile collision in the city of Detroit, on the 9th day of December, 1948. On grounds hereinafter noted defendants moved to dis miss plaintiffs’ suit. Defendants’ motion was granted unless proof was filed in court that restitution had been made within a time limited. Plaintiffs, who did not make restitution, have appealed.

Briefly stated, plaintiffs claim that while plaintiff Hosea A. Carey was driving his automobile on the date above mentioned it was struck by a Ford pickup truck…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kirl v. ZinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Drohan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. McCary v. Monongahela Valley Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stefanac v. Cranbrook Educational CommunityMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Leahan v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rinke v. Automotive Moulding Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Rowady v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Kircos v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API