Legal Opinion

Kircos v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1981No. Docket 50959PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of accelerated judgment entered in favor of defendants-appellees on March 25, 1980.

Defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment was apparently brought under GCR 1963, 116.1(5). In reviewing motions for accelerated judgment, courts must accept all well-pled allegations of the nonmoving party as true. Robards v Estate of Kantzler, 98 Mich App 414, 416; 296 NW2d 265 (1980).

As noted in Kircos v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, 70 Mich App 612; 247 NW2d 316 (1976), wherein the jurisdiction of the trial court over defendant Haas was challenged, plaintiffs filed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Klever v. KleverMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kirl v. ZinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Meadows v. Depco Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Sobczak v. KotwickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wallisch v. FosnaughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Tonegatto v. BudakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Rinaldi v. RinaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Difronzo v. Village of Port SanilacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. McLeod v. Providence Christian SchoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API