Kircos v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of accelerated judgment entered in favor of defendants-appellees on March 25, 1980.
Defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment was apparently brought under GCR 1963, 116.1(5). In reviewing motions for accelerated judgment, courts must accept all well-pled allegations of the nonmoving party as true. Robards v Estate of Kantzler, 98 Mich App 414, 416; 296 NW2d 265 (1980).
As noted in Kircos v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, 70 Mich App 612; 247 NW2d 316 (1976), wherein the jurisdiction of the trial court over defendant Haas was challenged, plaintiffs filed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Klever v. KleverMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Kirl v. ZinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Meadows v. Depco Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Sobczak v. KotwickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wallisch v. FosnaughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tonegatto v. BudakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rinaldi v. RinaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Difronzo v. Village of Port SanilacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- McLeod v. Providence Christian SchoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.