Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Parks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 1, 1923No. 8 Div. 588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff (appellee) had judgment on a policy of insurance on the life of her husband issued by defendant. Defense was made under the general issue “with leave to offer in evidence any matter or thing that, if specially pleaded, would constitute a good defense.” One condition of the policy (among others) was that “no obligation is assumed by the company prior to the date hereof, nor unless on said date the insured is alive and in sound health,” and defendant undertook to show a breach of this stipulation — warranty, as we have held —that insured, at the time of the delivery of the polic^,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MandelbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Bozicevich v. Kenilworth Mercantile Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lidge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Prudential Ins. Co. v. CalvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. GuytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Cleveland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API