Legal Opinion

Rhorbacker v. Citizens Building Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1941No. 28551PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Under the facts narrated, the Court of Appeals found that a valid contract had been entered into between L. Floy Walker and The Citizens Building Association Company, enforceable by Sceva Sti'nebaugh Walker, and she was accordingly awarded the certificate of deposit and the proceeds represented thereby. The executor contends such determination was erroneous and now asks for a judgment in his favor.

Controversies relating to joint and survivorship bank accounts and certificates of deposit have been before this court a number of times. The latest pronouncement directly on the subject is found in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Estate of Staver v. StaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Deal's Adm'r v. Merchants & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Rogers v. GosnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. Malone v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Seavey v. Estate of FanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wright v. BloomOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mark-It Place Foods, Inc. v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Quilter v. WendlandTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Beach v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1943

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API