Wrigley v. Cornelius

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opínion of the Court.

The appellees sued the appellants for not accepting part of the goods which the appellees allege that the appellants contracted to buy from the appellees.

The first head of the appellants’ brief is: “ The improper admission of evidence.” The abstract shows no exception to the admission of any evidence.

Second. “ The refusal of proper instructions on the question of the burden of proof.” Those instructions are:

“ The jury are instructed that the burden of proof in this class of cases is always upon the party holding the affirmative; and…