Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Easterbrook, Circuit Judge.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701 - 21, establishes a framework under which tribes may conduct gambling on land held in trust for their use. Some kinds of gambling may be conducted by every tribe, in every state, without prior approval. But class III gambling, which includes slot machines and table games such as blackjack, may be offered only in states that allow at least some non-Indian groups to conduct similar gambling, and then only if tribe and state enter into a compact or contract covering the operation. 25 U.S.C. § 2710 . Both a federal…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- T. S. v. Heart of CarDon, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Conviser v. DePaul UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Hossfeld v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024