Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Shelton

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 2018No. CV–17–601PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

--------

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge *96This is a property case in which Julie Shelton brought an action against Penny Carroll claiming parking rights pursuant to the language of a deeded easement and, alternatively, pursuant to claims of a prescriptive easement, and further claiming damages to her mailbox, real property, and hardwood floors in her house caused by redirected water after an excavation project undertaken by Carroll. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded the deed's language concerning ingress and egress also contemplated the need for parking on the easement; alternatively, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. & A. Construction Co. v. Benning Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Ridenoure v. BallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Edge v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  4. VanMatre v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Five Forks Hunting Club, LLC v. Nixon Family PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Cross County School District v. Beth Turbiville; Joseph W. Turbiville; Melissa White; And Arthur C. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Rats Entertainment Park, LLC v. Rogers Land & Timber, LLC And Joe M. Rogers, Sr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API