Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. . Tuttle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court submitted the following issues affecting the apellants [appellants]:

"1. Was there an arrangement and understanding, at or before the time of executing the deed to L. E. and C. E. Corpening, between the grantor and grantees, that the bid of Welch Galloway was to be assigned and the land conveyed to said L. E. and C. E. Corpening, and that defendant R. M. Tuttle was to share with them in the profits of any future sale or was to receive any compensation individually for its execution?" Answer: "Yes."
"4. Is this action barred by the statute of limitations, as to the plaintiffs or any of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harding v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Pretzfelder v. Merchants Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Sears v. . ShaferNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Bruner v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Burgess v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Swartzberg v. Reserve Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. DarsieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API