Legal Opinion
Lake City Apartments v. Lund-Martin Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1988No. C9-87-1462PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
Lake City Apartments (Lake City) brought suit against Lund-Martin Company (Lund-Martin) and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul Fire) for damages due to defective construction of a fire lane for an apartment complex. Lake City later amended its complaint to include plumbing, insulation, concrete and site drainage defects in the construction of the complex. Lund-Martin and St. Paul Fire then brought a third party action against Swanson Plumbing and Heating, Inc. (Swanson) and Orv Bakke Insulation, Inc. (Bakke) for contribution and indemnity. After…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Swenson v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Continental Grain Company v. Fegles Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lake City Apartments v. Lund-Martin Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Pamida, Inc. v. Christenson Building Corporation, Defendant/third Party v. R & Q Trucking, Inc. Maxim Technologies, Inc. Lowell Johnson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Pamida, Inc. v. Christenson BuildingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Hennepin County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990