Legal Opinion

State v. Dearborn

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 24, 2008No. 2007AP1894-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VERGERONT, J.

¶ 1. David Dearborn appeals a judgment of conviction for assaulting or otherwise obstructing, or resisting a conservation warden contrary to Wis. Stat. § 29.951 (2005-06) 2 and for possession of tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e). He makes two contentions on appeal. First, he asserts his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict was violated by the jury instruction stating that he may be found guilty of violating § 29.951 if the jury found he assaulted or resisted or obstructed a conservation warden, rather than requiring the jury to unanimously…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Holland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hollins v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. State v. DevriesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  4. David Hollins v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API