Legal Opinion
Duvallon v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 3, 1986No. 83-1468PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
When she was arrested and charged with indecent exposure in violation of D.C. Code § 22-1112(a) (1981), Ms. Duvallon was engaged in a protest directed to the Supreme Court of the United States because of what she deemed to be the denial of her federal constitutional rights, both by the courts of *725the United States and the courts of Florida. At trial, the government proved that Du-vallon intentionally exposed her bare buttocks to public view. She was convicted as charged. She contends the statute, as written, does not interdict the public exposure of the bare buttocks.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. BradfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- State of Oregon v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Perkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. CastanedaNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- High v. McLean Financial Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- National Railroad Passenger v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- People v. MassicotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Nelson v. NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.