Legal Opinion
In Re Hunt's Pier Associates
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 10, 1992No. 19-10548PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
Before this court is a motion of Vekoma International B.V. (“Vekoma”) requesting a determination that the automatic stay does not apply to its right to foreclose upon certain amusement rides claimed to be owned by the Debtor-partnership, Hunt’s Pier Associates (“the Debtor”). The rides were pledged as security to Vekoma by New Hunt’s Pier Corporation (“the Corporation"), an entity which the Debtor allowed to manage and operate an amusement pier containing the rides. In the al ternative, Vekoma seeks relief from the automatic stay,…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- United Companies Financial Corp. v. BrantleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1980
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mayer Pollock Steel Corp. v. London Salvage & Trading Co. (In Re Mayer Pollock Steel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re Bedford Square Associates, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re GrigoliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- In Re U.S. Physicians, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Hunt's Pier Associates v. Conklin (In Re Hunt's Pier Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.