Legal Opinion

Jacques Wolfe & Co. v. Piplin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 17, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ brings up for review a judgment of the Passaic County Common Pleas Court affirming a finding and determination in favor of the employe in a compensation ease. The petitioner was in the employ of the prosecutor as a laborer and alleges that he suffered accidental injuries on April 19th, 1933, which resulted in a hernia. His petition was filed on September 8th, 1933, and a hearing had on April 4th, and May 14th, 1934. After proofs were taken, the deputy commissioner, on June 29th, 1934, dismissed the petition because,, as he said, the petitioner “has not proved conclusively that the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bearman v. Prudential Ins. Co. Of America. Bearman v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n. Bearman v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Conquy v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Bearman v. Prudential Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  5. Ridgeway v. Real Estate Operating Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API