Legal Opinion
Conquy v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 1, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 N.J. Super. 325 (1952)
93 A.2d 23
BENNETT K. CONQUY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW JERSEY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 3, 1952.
Decided December 1, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.
Mr. Harry Lane, Jr., argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Lewis P. Dolan argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Dolan and Dolan, attorneys; Mr. Robert J. Ford on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.
The Workmen's Compensation Bureau awarded petitioner partial permanent disability of 5% of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Russo v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Helminsky v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Fusco v. Cambridge Piece Dyeing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Jacques Wolfe & Co. v. PiplinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fink v. PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Baginsky v. American Smelt. & Refin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Bisonic v. Halsey Packard, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.