Legal Opinion

Charles Albert v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 19, 1971No. 280-68PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVIS, Judge:

Eight civilian employees of the Army Pictorial Center — veterans in both senses- — sue to set aside, as invalid, their re-classifications downward in 1966. They were all photographic technicians or photographers. In October of that year each was informed by letter that management proposed to reduce his position in grade (two grades in seven instances, and three in the other) after 30 days. Plaintiffs gave written replies protesting these reclassification-demotions which were nevertheless made effective in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richard L. Schlegel v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. L. M. Daniels and Clayton G. Leonard v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. A. Lincoln Green v. J. Stanley Baughman, President, Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. Paul W. Burkett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Eclov v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Bielec v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Atwell v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Donnie A. Ward v. Alan K. Campbell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Boege v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API