State v. Duncan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants, nude dancers and patrons of a nude dancing bar, were convicted of violating Minnesota’s indecent conduct statute, specifically for engaging in “any open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior, or any public indecency” in public. Minn.Stat. § 617.23(a)(3) (1996). On appeal, they challenge the constitutionality of the governing statute as applied to them, claiming it penalizes them for conduct that they might have reasonably understood to be lawful at the time it occurred. They also contend the statute, part of Minnesota’s Obscenity Code, is overbroad on its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.