Legal Opinion

State v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 2000No. C3-99-703Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellants, nude dancers and patrons of a nude dancing bar, were convicted of violating Minnesota’s indecent conduct statute, specifically for engaging in “any open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior, or any public indecency” in public. Minn.Stat. § 617.23(a)(3) (1996). On appeal, they challenge the constitutionality of the governing statute as applied to them, claiming it penalizes them for conduct that they might have reasonably understood to be lawful at the time it occurred. They also contend the statute, part of Minnesota’s Obscenity Code, is overbroad on its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API