Legal Opinion
State Bank v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 18, 1923No. 6894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CO-BBS, X
In this case, upon the facts, the trial court found:
“I find, that if the said Lee earned any commissions, it was a part of his agreement with Williams, the defendant, that no commissions were to be paid by Williams unless Butler, the purchaser, should pay the notes evidencing a part of the, consideration,, and that the s'ale in contemplation of the parties was not considered consummated until Butler paid the purchase-money notes, and that the said Butler failed to pay such notes, and consequently the commissions did not accrue, and the defendant did not become liable therefor.”
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Baldwin v. Haskell National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Baldwin v. Haskell Nat. BankTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Baldwin v. Haskell Nat. BankTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Stephens v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norton v. MacateeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Abilene v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Stevens v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Shell v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931