Baldwin v. Haskell Nat. Bank
Texas Supreme Court
On motion for rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtRamsey, J.
In its motion for a rehearing, seasonably filed in this court, the defendant in error expressly remits “all amounts due it except the said principal sum of $2,050, with 6 per cent, interest thereon from the 28th day of January, 1908, the date on which same was to have been paid, and does here now expressly waive its right to a submission of the issue of the question as to plaintiff in error having authorized the change in the note,” and asks that its motion for rehearing be granted, and our judgment be reformed, so as to decree to it a recovery for the sum admitted to be due, with interest…
2Cited by21 opinions
- United Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Spin-Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- Texas Employers' Insurance v. LightfootTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Bohn v. Burton-Lingo Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Landon v. HalcombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Bills v. BillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.