Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Haskell Nat. Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Third Supreme Judicial District. Action by the Haskell National Bank against J. L. Baldwin. From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming a judgment for plaintiff (124 S. W. 443), defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRamsey, J.

For some years before January 28, 1907, J. L. Baldwin had been a customer of the Haskell National Bank. On or before that date he owed the bank several thousand dollars. We gather from the record that the relations between the parties had become mutually unsatisfactory. Baldwin seems to have thbught that the bank was charging him both usurious and excessive interest, while the bank had concluded that his indebtedness to it was excessive, and that for other reasons he was not a desirable customer. After considerable negotiation, it was finally agreed that Baldwin should pay his indebtedness to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Spin-Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance v. LightfootTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. First State Bank of Riesel v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bohn v. Burton-Lingo Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Landon v. HalcombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API