Legal Opinion

Clostermann v. Schmidt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Attorney General of the United States, acting in his capacity as the Alien Property Custodian, pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act (50 USC App § 1 et seq.), and to whom we will hereinafter refer as “the Custodian.” It has its origin in a proceeding for a declaratory judgment initiated by Robert G. Clostermann, as executor of the last -will and testament of Friedrich Georg Gottlob Schmidt, to determine whether legal and actual reciprocity existed between the United States and Germany on the date of Schmidt’s death, as required by § 61-107, OCLA (Oregon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. SpelarSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zschernig v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State Land Board v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Arizona State Board of Accountancy v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Zschernig v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Schnitzer v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API