Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, SpA
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 25, 1977No. Civ. A. 4319PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALEB, M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Once again this Court must consider whether plaintiffs in this action may be allowed to amend their complaints 1 to add allegations of fraud and inequitable conduct by the defendant in connection with an interference proceeding in the Patent Office. When the motions were first presented in 1975, this Court held that the only issues properly triable in an appeal from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences under 35 U.S.C. § 146 were those issues which had been presented to the Board. Since plaintiffs’ motions sought to add issues which had not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Norman W. Kirschke and General Electric Company v. William C. LamarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Standard Oil Co. v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Company v. EI DuPONT De NEMOURS & COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981