Legal Opinion

State v. Engelhorn

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2016No. 20160058PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS; Justice,

[¶ 1] , The State appeals after the district court ruled the State could not use a defendant’s horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test results as evidence of impairment in a jury trial for actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. We reverse, concluding the court misapplied the law regarding the admissibility of HGN test results.

I

[¶ 2] According to McLean County Deputy Sheriff Curt Olson’s affidavit, Olson approached a running vehicle after responding to an early-morning report the vehicle was in a ditch. Olson observed the driver sleeping inside…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brewer v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CoronaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API