Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City Court of City of Mesa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1990No. CV-90-0003-PRPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Chief Justice.

Leonard Joseph LoPresti (defendant) petitioned for review of a court of appeals’ opinion affirming the superior court’s grant of special action relief to the State. The superior court’s ruling permits the State to introduce horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test results, in the absence of a chemical analysis of defendant’s blood alcohol content (BAC), as proof defendant violated A.R.S. § 28-692(A), which provides:

It is unlawful and punishable as provided in § 28-692.01 for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or be in actual physical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WitteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court · 2000

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API