State v. Murphy
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRCH, Justice.
The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court that convicted Cora Murphy, the defendant, of driving while under the influence of an intoxicant 1 and remanded the case for a new trial. We consider now the appeal of the State of Tennessee, 2 and we must determine whether testimony concerning an Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (“HGN”) sobriety test constitutes “scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge” under Tenn. R. Evid. 702. We hold that the HGN test is a scientific test. To be admissible at trial, such evidence must satisfy the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- State v. WitteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. FergusonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State of Tennessee v. Angela M. MerrimanTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. BaueNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.