Legal Opinion
Klor v. Hannon
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 19, 1967No. 65-1302PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HAUK, District Judge.
The complaint herein adequately states a claim under Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,1 2because it alleges facts which show that the defendants: (1) while aeting under color of state statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, (2) subjected, or caused to be subjected, a person within the jurisdiction of the United States to the deprivation of rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States. Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24, 30 (9th Cir. 1962); Marshall…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- State v. DamonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Henderson v. GoekeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971