Legal Opinion
Hurtado v. Suprenant
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01433Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JAMES HURTADO, et. al., 4 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01433-GMN-EJY 5 vs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 6 KEN SUPRENANT, DISMISS IN PART 7 Defendant, 8 and 9 AGILITY CREDIT, LLC 10 Nominal Defendant. 11 12 Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), filed by Defendant Ken 13 Suprenant. Plaintiffs James Hurtado and Stephanie Hurtado filed a Response, (ECF No. 6), to 14 which Defendant filed a Reply, (ECF No. 10).1 15 For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part the Motion to Dismiss. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 This case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.