Legal Opinion
Caroline C. Doetsch v. Lawrence Doetsch, Individually Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 11, 1963No. 13767_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
This diversity action was brought by plaintiff, Caroline Doetsch, as income beneficiary of an inter vivos trust created by her deceased husband, John A. Doetsch, during his life. By her complaint, plaintiff sought to hold the trustee of this trust, defendant Lawrence Doetsch, liable for a breach of his fiduciary duty in failing to pay her income which she alleged was still due her under the terms of the trust. In the alternative, plaintiff sought to hold defendants, Lawrence Doetsch, Eugene Doetsch, A. D. Doetsch and Robert Doetsch, liable for that portion of a federal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In Re Gallagher's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Leonard CharneskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Holland v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Ennis L. Mazza, of the Estate of Raymond J. Mazza, Deceased v. Olga M. MazzaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- In Re Estate of Herbert R. Penney, Deceased. Milton H. Penney v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- First Natl. Bk. of Mount Dora v. Shawmut Bk. of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.