Grunsfeld v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLagarde, Justice
I agree with and concur in the majority’s disposition of Grunsfeld’s first three points. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting evidence of extraneous offenses during the punishment phase of Grunsfeld’s trial. Accordingly, I would affirm.
The majority hold that article 37.07, section 3(a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure forbids the introduction of extraneous offense evidence during the punishment phase of a trial. This section, which was amended in 1989, provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
Sec. 3. Evidence of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller-El v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Faulk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.